天刀怎么查看隐藏成就:帮我写一份英语演讲稿 题目是Your idea about capital punishment（对死刑的思考）用英语写啊

你是大学水平还是高中啊？你是赞成取消死刑还是同意啊？我对300分很感兴趣哦，只是中文翻译我懒得写，不过保证你能看懂，而且读的通顺。你回答了我的2个问题，我就替你捉刀~
那你耐心等哦，我不喜欢非原创，相信楼主也是吧。
My Idea about capital punishment
In the modern global community, the ideas of liberalism and democracy are widely accepted. People embrace freedom to an extent that has never been achieved throughout history. However, some countries go a little bit too far. The abolishment of capital punishment is just one example. These counties argue that no authority is entitled to deprive individuals of their right to live. Even those who commit felonies such as murder, rape and arson should be put in prison rather than on a guillotine. They believe their practice embodies humanism which goes well beyond the tit-for-tat juridical tradition that is passed down for generations. In my mind, however, death penalty should not be abolished, as long as there is a possibility of grave crimes in the world.
In the Chinese language, there is a proverb that goes like this: A merciful angel frightens no devil.(门神善了鬼不怕). The capital punishment is the last weapon that awes potential criminals. If there were no nuclear bombs, would China have felt at least apparently at ease at the militaristic menace posed by the USSR in early 1960s? Perhaps this is not an appropriate analogue, but China is a country which holds one fourths of the world population. Now our country is still not safe enough partly due to lack of policing. If the penalties are loosen, China will be in a mess, with so acute confrontational sentiments between the rich and poor and so uneven distribution of properties. Not only won’t our goals of a better-off society be achieved, but stability, our basis of national development will also be threatened.
I will have to mention the case of Singapore as well. We all know that a year ago an young Australian was executed there for carrying drugs. Singapore was thus widely criticized for its despotism by European and Australian presses. Given that the independence of justice of one nation should be respected if it does not defy international laws, we must know that Singapore is a key port. If the law is not strict enough, will this tiny country enjoy its peace and stability as we constantly admire?
You may say that both China and Singapore are oriental countries whose rulers are descendants of thousand-year-long feudal monarchies. We just shift our focus to the most liberal country, the United States. Do Americans say goodbye to death penalty? We safely come to a conclusion that it death penalty is not a case of tradition, but an earthy need indeed.
You may also argue that despite the abolishment of capital punishment the EU is still well-organized with no significant rise in crime rate. That is correct. I never deny that EU is safer than the US and China. But I would like to remind you of Milocevic’s death in Hague. Yes, even if he is convicted won’t he be killed at once, but he was left in a small room with no access to basic medical care. He died of heart attack. What a good death. The Europeans remove a pain in the ass without using a knife. Europeans treasure human rights. They tried Milocevic for his genocide of Croats. But note the Rwanda genocide.Which Tony Blair or Jacque Chirac grieved for the victims of Rwanda genocide? Where was the EU then? I find sheer dual standards. I find typical hypocrisy.
To accomplish humanity we have too many things to do, except the consideration of the abolishment of death penalty. Perhaps this is done one day in the future when China is more democratic and liberal. But now, we must stick to death penalty for the good of the majority of the citizens, not of the criminals.

My idea Your idea about capital punishment（对死刑的思考）这篇不难的，是演讲稿，你多读几遍就能明白大意了：）~~

The word "capital" in "capital punishment" refers to a person's head. In the past, people were often executed by severing their head from their body. Today, in China, most prisoners are breeded a deadly bullet for death penalty, in U.S., lethal injection has been in place of it.
Those who oppose capital punishment argue that capital punishment is not ethical. They contend that executions deny the intrinsic value of human life. They argue that capital punishment does not deter crime and it may cause violence to increase. They also state economic reasons for arguing against capital punishment, one of these reasons is that more expensive for the state to execute a criminal than to incarcerate him for life.
I disagree with above view. I argue that capital punishment is ethical. The opponents misunderstand the purpose of the death penalty. It is not based on revenge. It is based on retribution. Capital punishment will deter crime, because it sends a message to the criminals that they won't get away with it. I also disagree that capital punishment is more expensive. The opponents who support this idea don't look at the overall picture. Capital punishment will absolutely reduce the economic cost to the taxpayers.

human lives are intrinsically and equally valuable. It is a moral principle that the criminal deserves the penalty of execution if he committed murder. Capital punishment is a unique and powerful communal response, because it is permanent and cannot be overturned. It is more torturous and inhumane to make the criminals to spend all their life in jail.

In conclusion, i believe that capital punishment is essential for our society, but a strict and systematic institution which can watch rigorously the processing is more significant for just sentence. If not, all would be evil. For example the return of "murdered wife" in China. I think this can only act in China. But i have a dream of just society which depend upon reforming judicial system in China.

你们老师真够刁难人的……你写出中文来让大家给你翻译吧。毕竟思考是自己的事情。别人能帮你表达的只能借助英语这个形式。好不好？

My idea about capital punishment

I feel that capital punishment is necessary despite human rights organisations protesting against it due to humanity issues. Although a person can be wrongly executed, this form of punishment is still important in maintaining a safe society and possibly decreasing crime rates.

Criminals nowadays have no sense of right and wrong so they do not care about their actions and the consequences, if they do not care then why should others care about them? Most of them have issues and serious problems so they have no contribution to the society at all, what is the point in keeping these people alive if all they are capable of is doing damage?

Some people might argue that this is no way to treat anyone even if that person is a criminal. But we are talking about mass murderes here, they take away other people's lives, they take away other people's right to live. Do the victims not equally have rights? These hard criminals bring anguish to families, they should not get off lightly and before we talk about human rights, we should think about moral issues first, that is nobody has the right to take away anyone's life. So they should pay with a heavy price.

没时间翻译抱歉抱歉!