金日净水器骗局揭秘:请帮我翻译一下

来源:百度文库 编辑:高考问答 时间:2024/04/19 17:02:26
As with any study, there are potential limitations to the findings. First, although statistical techniques were used to control for differences in the two groups, the conclusions would be stronger if the two groups were more similar. There appears to be potential for self-selection bias in the schools that participate with the Advocate Unit. The Advocate Unit schools are different from the population in the size of the loans, level of family contribution, amount of financial aid received, degree offerings (e.g., associate’s versus bachelor’s), and reasons the students left school. It is possible that the true effect of the Advocate Unit is suppressed due to these differences. The length of the study also needs consideration. Although a longitudinal effect was found, it would most likely be useful to extend the study to see if the positive effects from Advocate Unit participation are sustainable.

关于任何的研究,有对调查结果的潜在限制。 如果这二个团体更相似,首先,虽然统计的技术用来在这二个团体中为不同控制,但是结论会比较强壮。 在那里似乎为以提倡者单位叁加的学校的自己-选择偏见是潜能。 提倡者单位学校不同于贷款的大小,家庭贡献的程度的人口,被受到的财务帮助的数量,程度提供 (举例来说, 同伴和学士比较), 而且说服学生左边学校。 是可能的是,由于这些不同提倡者单位的真实效果被镇压。 研究的长度也需要考量。 如果实在从提倡者单位分享产生,虽然纵观的效果被发现, 但是,它会很有可能有用扩充研究见到是足以支撑的。