党旗颂朗诵伴奏:请问记者彼得@阿内特的英文怎么写?????急!!

Peter Arnett

Peter Arnett
Peter Arnett(出生于1934)是一位新西兰出生新闻工作者。Arnett运作为全国地理杂志,和然后为电视。他是知名的为战争他的覆盖面,包括越南战争和海湾战争。他被授予了1966年普利策奖在国际报告为他的工作在越南,他是存在从1962年到1975年,多半时间报告为美联社通讯社。他变成了尊敬因为某人没有信任什么他没看见与他自己的观点。
1994年,Arnett写了活从战场:从越南向巴格达,35年在世界大战区域。

海湾战争
1999年Arnett工作了为CNN18年结束。在海湾战争期间他全世界变成了一个家喻户哓的事当他变成了唯一的记者以现场转播直接地从巴格达。与二位其它CNN新闻工作者,Bernard·Shaw和约翰·Holliman一起,Arnett带来了连续的覆盖面从巴格达战争(1991的1月17日)16个初期强烈的小时。即使40位外国新闻工作者当时是存在在AlRashid旅馆在巴格达,只有CNN拥有了手段通信对外部世界。其它新闻工作者非常很快离开伊拉克,包括二个CNN同事,左Peter Arnett作为单一记者余留那里。他的报告关于平民损伤由轰炸造成由联合战争管理很好未接受,由对条款的他们恒定的用途象聪明的炸弹和外科精确度设法设想图象平民受害者会是在极小值。在1月25日白宫说Arnett被使用了作为为伊拉克假情报的一个工具,然而CNN收到了一封信从34位议员指控Arnett不爱国的新闻事业。

战争开始,Arnett能获得与萨达姆·的一次未审查的采访侯赛因的星期以后。

海湾战争变成了第一战争被看见的真实地活在电视,并且Arnett是用许多方式单一球员报告从"对方当事人"五个星期的期间。

在1997年3月,Arnett能采访本·拉登,作为第一西部新闻工作者做如此。

婴孩牛奶工厂争论
Arnett的最有争议的报告的当中一个在海湾战争期间是一个报告关于怎样联合轰炸了一家婴孩牛奶工厂。在报告之后,空军发言人陈述的"许多来源表明,工厂同生物战生产联系在一起"。那天晚些时候,ColinPowell陈述"它是一种生物武器设施,那我们是肯定的"。白宫发言人细索Fitzwater陈述了",工厂是,实际上,生产设施为生物武器,"并且"伊拉克人掩藏了这种设施在婴孩牛奶生产之后门面作为假情报的形式。"粗暴做的手画标志读书"婴孩牛奶的"图象用英语和阿拉伯语在工厂前面,和实验室外套穿戴了在诉讼遏制被缝在读书"婴孩牛奶工厂伊拉克上写字"只被服务对更加进一步看法,据称平民目标由萨达姆·侯赛因简单地做看起来象那,并且Arnett由伊拉克政府欺骗了。标志看上去由伊拉克人增加了在摄像组到达了作为一种便宜的宣传会话策略之前。Newsweek称事件"ham-handed企图描述一个被轰炸的生物武器工厂在巴格达附近作为婴孩惯例工厂。"

Arnett保留了牢固。他游览了工厂在早先8月,和是迫切的,"任何其他它,它导致了婴儿惯例"。被描述作为是一个确实的堡垒由五角大楼,Arnett报告了看只一卫兵在门和很多搽粉的婴孩牛奶,陈述""尽量我能告诉您对此,"他仔细地补充说。"它看起来足够无辜从什么我们能看。"。

CNN摄像组被邀请游览这个工厂上1990年8月。他们录影了工作者穿新制服以在上写字在英国读书,"伊拉克婴孩牛奶厂。"通讯员,理查·Roth,是疑神疑鬼那时对工厂的真实性的和表达的疑义当他宣扬了他的报告。Arnett没有表达这样怀疑。

采访以后,帮助了修造它的工厂的法国承包商,Michel·Wery,1979年接受了他阐明的采访,工厂单一地生产婴孩牛奶当它开始了,并且未被装备养殖病原生物。1980年工厂,他说,关闭了当最后法国技术员工作为他的公司离开巴格达。没人从Wery的公司从那以后回来。Wery认为他听见了生产重新开始了在联合国禁运去年秋天放在适当的位置之后,但他怀疑是否那是可能的在10年的暂时平息以后。在工厂中是至少四次因为进行修理的二位牛奶店技术员;你象最近阐明,在访问期间1990年5月,说,这是所有正常牛奶店设备并且工厂实际上是罐装牛奶粉末。可疑制服缝实际上作为原始的制服的部分由法国人供应,并且英尺长度显示制服实际上被射击了在1990年8月。

一部分的问题在和解各种各样的美国和外国帐户是,政府官员认为他们由证券考虑强迫了从确切地显露怎么他们知道关于工厂。同时,新西兰技术员和法国建造者没有在工厂在5月以后,无法是肯定什么发生了在他们的离开以后。

白宫报告分流了此时。一位官员声称1990年工厂被转换了。另声称这是"备用"bioweapons设施,未被转换。三认为,这不是bioweapons设施,但是它使用使项目关键对bioweapons研究;所有三被要求的知情人信息。在一个机要备忘录从1992年12月,国务院雇员讨论工厂的问题和报告,没有暗藏的分庭或不适当的机械,并且看起来是一家完全正常工厂为生产搽粉的牛奶。

图象工厂进行了证券修改从5月1990年。在这些之中是伪装油漆在所有大厦在复合体,证券篱芭,和安置二个Sa2表面宣扬导弹电池。另外,伊拉克人声称他们得到搽粉的牛奶为工厂从Nestl3e,但是假的Nestl3e认为。他们说他们未提供产品给这个工厂。

ColinPowell基于总统一份简报每星期在工厂被轰炸了之前。Powell告诉了布什总统,情报根据从代理在伊拉克里面阐明,伊拉克人修改了工厂入一个生物武器工厂。

行动Tailwind
1998年Arnett叙述一个合资企业在CNN和时代杂志之间叫NewsStand,描述了什么他称"行动Tailwind。"报告认为1970年,美国陆军使用了沙林反对一个小组离开美国战士在老挝。在反应,五角大楼委任了其它报告抗辩CNN's.CNN随后缩回了故事在进行一次内部调查以后,并且一定数量的人负责对报告被解雇了或被迫使辞职。Arnett由他的雇主谴责了,并且他的合同未被更新。

采访在伊拉克
在任务为美国全国广播公司和全国地理,2003年Arnett去伊拉克报道美国入侵。在新闻会议那里他授予了一次采访国立伊拉克电视在2003年3月31日之后,他陈述了,"现在美国重新评估战场,延迟战争反对伊拉克,可能一个星期和重写战争计划。第一计划无法由于伊拉克抵抗。现在他们设法写其它计划。如此我们的报告关于平民受害者这里,关于伊拉克军队的抵抗,去回到美国。它帮助那些反对战争当您质询政策开发他们的论据。"

当Arnett的评论引起了抗议"火暴",美国全国广播公司最初地辩护了他,说他接受了采访作为专业礼貌和他的评论是"分析的在本质里"。一天以后,虽然,美国全国广播公司,MSNBC和全国地理所有被切断他们的与Arnett的关系。

以回应关于伊拉克电视的Arnett的声明,公司陈述,"它是错误为Arnett先生授予与state-controlled伊拉克人电视的一次采访,特别一次战争和它是错误使他讨论他的个人观察和看法。"Arnett反应了,"我愚笨的判断错误将度过十五分钟在与伊拉克television.I的一次即兴采访根本上说在那次采访什么我们全部知道战争,有是延迟在实施政策,那里是惊奇。"

那天晚些时候,Arnett由英国的小报报纸聘用了每日镜子,反对战争。他并且两三天以后被分配了到希腊电视频道网络电视,和比利时人VTM。

行情
Arnett引述一名美军官员在越南,当询问背景至于对重的火炮的使用反对一个小村庄。不管Arnett被做这或不是争执,因为官员在考虑中无法记住做声明:
"我们必须毁坏村庄为了储蓄它。"
当要求萨达姆·侯赛因如果他体会他由不让步犯了一个错误由科威特在联合,萨达姆的坚持被回答:
"我不后果的关心,阿拉是在我旁边在这奋斗中。"
当问2003年什么他打算做在被射击从美国全国广播公司以后:
"有一个小海岛,居住在南太平洋,我将设法游泳。"
外在链接
与Arnett的CNN采访,看后面沙漠风暴
Arnett在他的本·拉登采访
全国地理火Peter Arnett
2003年Arnett的有争议的评论CNN抄本被做
Washingtion岗位条款在2003采访
尝试Arnett为谋反,参议员说-条款在辛辛那提察问者
被解雇的CNN新闻工作者在Arnett解雇
公平:CNN's"Tailwind"和有选择性的媒介收缩

_________________________________________
PETER ARNETT
Peter Arnett is a New Zealand-born journalist. Arnett worked for National Geographic magazine, and then for television. He is well known for his coverage of war, including the Vietnam War and the Gulf War. He was awarded the 1966 Pulitzer Prize in International Reporting for his work in Vietnam, where he was present from 1962 to 1975, most of the time reporting for the Associated Press news agency. He became respected as someone who did not trust anything he had not seen with his own eyes.

In 1994, Arnett wrote Live from the Battlefield: From Vietnam to Baghdad, 35 Years in the World's War Zones.

The Gulf War
Arnett worked for CNN for 18 years ending in 1999. During the Gulf War he became a household name worldwide when he became the only reporter with live coverage directly from Baghdad. Together with two other CNN journalists, Bernard Shaw and John Holliman, Arnett brought continuous coverage from Baghdad for the 16 initial intense hours of the war . Even though 40 foreign journalists were present at the Al-Rashid Hotel in Baghdad at the time, only CNN possessed the means to communicate to the outside world. Very soon the other journalists left Iraq, including the two CNN colleagues, which left Peter Arnett as the sole reporter remaining there. His reports on civilian damages caused by the bombing were not received well by the coalition war administration, who by their constant use of terms like smart bombs and surgical precision had tried to project an image that civilian casualties would be at a minimum. On January 25 the White House said Arnett was used as a tool for Iraqi disinformation, while CNN received a letter from 34 Members of Congress accusing Arnett of unpatriotic journalism.

The week after that start of the war, Arnett was able to obtain an uncensored interview with Saddam Hussein.

The Gulf War became the first war seen truly live on TV, and Arnett was in many ways the sole player reporting from the "other side" for a period of five weeks.

In March 1997, Arnett was able to interview Osama bin Laden, as the first western journalist to do so.

The Baby Milk Factory Controversy
One of Arnett's most controversial reports during the Gulf War was a report on how the coalition had bombed a baby milk factory. Shortly after the report, an Air Force spokesman stated "Numerous sources have indicated that the factory is associated with biological warfare production". Later that day, Colin Powell stated "It was a biological weapons facility, of that we are sure". White House spokesman Marlin Fitzwater stated "That factory is, in fact, a production facility for biological weapons," and "The Iraqis have hidden this facility behind a facade of baby-milk production as a form of disinformation." The image of a crudely-made hand-painted sign reading "Baby Milk" in English and Arabic in front of the factory, and a lab coat dressed in a suit containing stitched lettering reading "BABY MILK PLANT IRAQ" only served to further the perception that purportedly civilian targets were simply being made to look like that by Saddam Hussein, and that Arnett was duped by the Iraqi government. The sign appeared to have been added by the Iraqis before the camera crews arrived as a cheap publicity ploy. Newsweek called the incident a "ham-handed attempt to depict a bombed-out biological-weapons plant near Baghdad as a baby-formula factory."

Arnett remained firm. He had toured the plant in the previous August, and was insistent that "Whatever else it did, it did produce infant formula". Described as being a veritable fortress by the Pentagon, Arnett reported seeing only one guard at the gate and a lot of powdered baby milk, stating ""That's as much as I could tell you about it," he added carefully. "It looked innocent enough from what we could see.".

A CNN camera crew had been invited to tour this plant last August 1990. They videotaped workers wearing new uniforms with lettering in English reading, "Iraq Baby Milk Plant." The correspondent, Richard Roth, was suspicious at that time and expressed doubts about the authenticity of the plant when he aired his report. Arnett expressed no such suspicions.

Interviewed later, the plant's French contractor who helped build it, Michel Wery, gave an interview in which he stated that the plant was producing solely baby milk when it started up in 1979, and was not equipped to breed pathogens. The plant closed in 1980, he said, when the last French technicians working for his company left Baghdad. No one from Wery’s company has been back since then. Wery said he had heard that production had restarted after the United Nations embargo put in place last fall, but he doubted whether that was possible after a 10-year lull. Two dairy technicians who had been in the plant at least four times since to make repairs; one stated that, during a visit as recent of May 1990, said that it was all normal dairy equipment and that the plant was actually canning milk powder. The suspicious uniform stitching was actually part of the original uniforms supplied by the French, and in fact the footage showing the uniforms was shot in August, 1990.

Part of the problem in reconciling the various U.S. and foreign accounts is that administration officials said they were constrained by security considerations from revealing exactly how they knew about the plant. At the same time, the New Zealand technicians and the French builder were not at the plant after May and cannot be certain of what happened after their departure.

White House reports diverged at this time. One official claimed that the plant was converted in 1990. Another claimed that it was a "backup" bioweapons facility, which had not yet been converted. A third said that it was not a bioweapons facility, but that it was used to make items crucial to bioweapons research; all three claimed insider information. In a confidential memo from December 1992, a State Department employee discussed the issue of the plant and reported that there were no hidden chambers or inappropriate machinery, and that it appeared to be a perfectly normal factory for producing powdered milk.

image The plant had undergone security modifications since May of 1990. Amongst these were camouflage paint on all buildings in the complex, a security fence, and the positioning of two SA-2 Surface to air missile batteries. In addition, the Iraqis had claimed that they were getting powdered milk for the plant from Nestlé, but Nestlé said that was false. They said they had supplied no products to this plant.

Colin Powell gave the president a briefing a week before the plant was bombed. Powell told President Bush that intelligence based from agents inside Iraq stated that the Iraqis had altered the plant into a biological weapons plant.

Operation Tailwind
In 1998 Arnett narrated a joint venture between CNN and Time Magazine called NewsStand, which described what he called "Operation Tailwind." The report said that the US Army had used Sarin against a group of deserting US soldiers in Laos in 1970. In response, The Pentagon commissioned another report contradicting CNN's. CNN subsequently retracted the story after conducting an internal investigation, and a number of the persons responsible for the report were fired or forced to resign. Arnett was reprimanded by his employer, and his contract was not renewed.

Interview in Iraq
On assignment for NBC and National Geographic, Arnett went to Iraq in 2003 to cover the U.S. invasion. After a press meeting there he granted an interview to state-run Iraq TV on March 31, 2003, in which he stated, "Now America is reappraising the battlefield, delaying the war against Iraq, maybe a week and rewriting the war plan. The first plan has failed because of Iraqi resistance. Now they are trying to write another plan. So our reports about civilian casualties here, about the resistance of the Iraqi forces, are going back to the United States. It helps those who oppose the war when you challenge the policy to develop their arguments."

When Arnett's remarks sparked a "firestorm of protest", NBC initially defended him, saying he had given the interview as a professional courtesy and that his remarks were "analytical in nature". A day later, though, NBC, MSNBC and National Geographic all severed their relationships with Arnett.

In response to Arnett's statement on Iraqi TV, the corporation stated, "It was wrong for Mr. Arnett to grant an interview with state-controlled Iraqi TV, especially at a time of war and it was wrong for him to discuss his personal observations and opinions." Arnett responded, "My stupid misjudgment was to spend fifteen minutes in an impromptu interview with Iraqi television.I said in that interview essentially what we all know about the war, that there have been delays in implementing policy, there have been surprises."

Later that day, Arnett was hired by the British tabloid newspaper the Daily Mirror, which opposed the war. A couple of days later he was also assigned to Greek television channel NET television, and Belgian VTM.

Quotes
Arnett quoting a U.S. army officer in Vietnam, when asked about the background for the use of much heavy artillery against a small village. Whether Arnett made this up or not is disputed, as the officer in question cannot remember making the statement:
"We had to destroy the village in order to save it."
When asking Saddam Hussein if he realized he had made a mistake by not withdrawing from Kuwait at the insistence of the coalition, Saddam answered:
"I don't care of the consequences, Allah is beside me in this struggle."
When asked what he intended to do after being fired from NBC in 2003:
"There's a small island, inhabited in the South Pacific, that I will try to swim to."

Peter Arnett Peter Arnett Peter Arnett Peter Arnett Peter Arnett Peter Arnett Peter Arnett Peter Arnett Peter Arnett Peter Arnett Peter Arnett Peter Arnett Peter Arnett Peter Arnett

Peter Arnett

Peter Arnett