链接服务器使用:谁有证明虎比狮子的文章

Not really. My motive was not to argue with Carnivora over this. My question to him was how is it that zoologists (with Ph.Ds) who have studied tigers over a number of years provide studies and statistics which clearly show the differences between the lives and roles of a male tiger and that of a tigress, and disprove all his assumptions. Dr.Charles McDougal\\\'s statistic was amazing, clearly showing the intensity of competition between male tigers, which is completely opposite of what carnivora said. I could not get a satisfactory explanation from Carnivora. Sorry to say, he completely avoided going near Dr.McDougal\\\'s report. It was quite beyond his range to question someone as authentic as Dr.McDougal (with 20 years of experience of tracking tigers) about tigers. Just as it would be beyond Dr.Charles McDougal\\\'s range to argue with carnivora about Polar bears. Go to any tiger website and Dr.Charles McDougal\\\'s name will definitely be mentioned as one of the foremost. He along with Dr.Mel Sunquist and Dr.John Seidensticker are not only famous, just as tiger researchers, but also as well qualified zoologists. Dr.Sunquist has clearly stated in his (or their) book that Tigers are better fighters than lions. There is a paragraph of it. They, not only base their opinions on Roman Collesium as Vick suggested but also on the words of Animal trainer who suggest that tiger is a better, shrewder \\\"boxer\\\" than the lion. Now, lion fans, don\\\'t jump on me regarding this statement, abusing or immediatly dis-crediting Dr.Sunquist. I could discredit carnivora in the same way because has no experience of studying wild tigers. The purpose of Dr.Sunquist\\\'s book was much bigger than to decide which is the better fighter. However, that statement coming from a textbook written by two Ph.Ds is significant. ）

Moreover Apollyon, if you remember clearly, I never brought Dr.Sunquist\\\'s book up until you challenged that because a Ph.D zoologist is supporting a lion, the victory lies with the lion. I knew much before that he had quoted tiger is a better fighter. I didn\\\'t bring it up before because I don\\\'t give specific importance to qualifications like you do. I only brought it up to show you that even Ph.Ds and well qualified professional zoologists with tremendous field experiences can have different opinions from each other. BTW,just read George Schaller\\\'s review on the book” .
http://bbs.uua.cn/dispbbs.asp?boardID=34&ID=1260&page=1