第47届金马奖获奖名单:摘要翻译 翻译成英文 急用

退耕还林 grain for grass
政策性粮款补助 policy-related grain subsidy
生态效益 ecological benefit
经济效益 economic benefit

Abstract: Grain for green is a significant measure taken to promote the harmonious development between man and nature, improve the entironment and an effecient way to promote rural structure adjustment as well, which has a direct effect on farmers' life and their long-term benefit. The primary target of grain for green is to emphasize ecological benefit, however, the realization of this ecological target is based on a guaranteed and sustainable economic benefit of farmers. From a long-term view, in 5 to 8 years, the government will no longer provide policy-related grain subsidy on grain for green, therefore, it should be taken into great consideration that by which the added income of farmers can be realized. This paper, starting from an analysis of the validity of grain for green and a deep study on the influence of grain for green to farmers' income, suggests that the implementation of grain for grass should give a bi-dimensional consideration on both ecological benefit and economic benefit, especially the state's macroeconomic target should be compatible with the farmers' microeconomic target in terms of economic benefit, and proposes relevant policies at the end.
人工翻译，希望能帮助你！

Take off to want:Backing the returns wood is life and farsighted benefits that valid path to promote person harmonize with nature the development, improve environmental graveness in ecosystem raise , and also is promote village construction adjust, relate to the farmer directly.The cultivatethat back the initial target returns the wood is an outstanding ecosystem performance, but the ecosystem target realizes with the economic benefits in peasant household is being guaranteed now, from long-last come to see can continuously for basal.Since farsighted see 5 years,8 yearses, back the return the wood the nation to no longer give a subsidy, the farmer increase to accept to is realized by what, ising to should to emphasize the problem that give considers.This text is from the Cultivate that back the usefulness analysis to return the wood to set out, goes deep in to investigate to back subsequently the Cultivate return the wood to the influence that farmer income bring, putting forward to back the Cultivate return wood's engineering puts should into practice to give the ecosystem performance considers with dual the degree in economic performance, the especially economic effect aspect shoulds to make a point of the national macroscopic economic target and economic target in tiny view in peasant household two compatible, is a homologous policy finally suggestion.

Takes back from agriculture also the forest is promotes the person and the nature harmonious development, the improvement ecological environment significant action, also promotes the countryside structure adjustment effective way, directly is relating farmer's life as well as the long-term benefits. Takes back from agriculture also the forest priority target is the prominent ecology benefit, but the ecology goal realization is obtains the guarantee for a long time by the peasant household economic in at present, from looked can continue for the foundation. In the long run 5 year, after 8 years, takes back from agriculture also the forest country no longer to give the policy grain funds subsidy, the farmer additionally receives depends on any to realize, is a question which must emphatically give to ponder. This article from takes back from agriculture also the forest valid analysis to embark, subsequently penetrates inquired into takes back from agriculture also the forest the influence which receives to the farmer brings, proposed takes back from agriculture also the forest project implementation to have to give the ecology benefit and the economic efficiency dual dimension ponder, specially the economical effect aspect must pay great attention to the country macroscopic economic target and the peasant household microscopic economic target two is accommodating, finally is the corresponding policy suggestion

Take off to want:Back the return the wood is to promote the person and nature harmonize the development, the graveness that improves the ecosystem environment raises the , also is promote the village structure adjust of valid path, relate to living and farsighted benefits of the farmer directly.The initial target that backs the to return the wood is an outstanding ecosystem performance, but realization of the ecosystem target with the economic benefits of peasant household gets the assurance currently, from long-last can keep on to see for basal.Since farsighted saw 5 years,8 yearses, backed the to return the wood, the nation no longer subsidized for the policy food style, the farmer increased accept depend what to carry out, is a problem that should emphasize to give the thinking.This text from back the usefulness analysis that the returns the wood to set out, the subsequently thorough investigation backs the influence that the returns the wood to bring to the farmer income, theimplement that puts forward backing the to return wood's engineering should give the thinking of the ecosystem performance and economic performance dual dimension, the especially economic effect should pay attention to the economic target of tiny view of macroscopic economic target in nation and peasant households two compatible, the end is a homologous policy suggestion