库尔德人是什么人种:Well-educated, well-paid?

According to the "China Youth Daily" reported on December 1, 2005, UNESCO provided by the "2005 Education for All Global Monitoring Report," presented a clear perspective : the higher qualifications and higher earnings. For our reality, the view can be fully demonstrated. For example, in China, university teachers has become one of the high-income groups; Instead, both urban and rural, to say the economy is usually the most difficult to accept less educated groups. But I think that educated and high income can not be absolutely equal, because a person does not mean that the ability of educated, the population is produced! It should be linked to income and ability. In any event, "the higher education, higher income" has become a reality. Its positive significance is obvious : will stimulate more investment in the education of their children warm family, thus allowing the overall quality of all of our citizens have improved. However, its negative effects should not be ignored --- the same equitable education if we can, then it will widen the income gap between different groups, and social stability have a negative impact.

英语高手帮忙翻译一篇文章:
据《中国青年报》2005年12月1日报道，联合国教科文组织提供的《2005全民教育全球监测报告》中明确提出这样一个观点：学历越高，收入越高。就我国的现实情况来说，这一观点也可以得到充分的证明。比如说，在我国，大学教师已经成为社会高收入人群之一；反之，无论城乡，经济最为困难的通常说来都是接受教育程度较低的群体。
但我认为，学历高和收入高不能绝对地划等号，因为一个人的学历高并不等于能力强，高分低能的人多的是！收入应该和能力相联系。
无论如何，“学历越高，收入越高”已成为一种现实。它的积极意义是显而易见的：必将激发起更多家庭投资子女教育的热情，从而使得我们全体公民的整体素质得到提高。但是，其负面效应同样不可忽视———假如我们不能实现教育公平，那么势必会拉大不同人群之间的收入差距，进而对社会的稳定产生消极的影响。