宝宝积食吃什么水果好:求翻译短文,多谢 计算机类的

来源:百度文库 编辑:高考问答 时间:2024/04/27 10:38:23
Justifying the MIS

MIS resources should be economically justified in the same manner as any other sizable expenditure. During the EDP era, firms usually justified the cost of a computer and its associated expenses by comparing the costs with those of the displaced manual, keydriven, or punched card systems. Even though the computer costs exceeded the costs of the keydriven and punched card equipment, fewer people were required for the computer system. The computer was then justified on the basis of displaced clerical costs. Few of these clerical workers actually lost their jobs, however, since they were usually transferred elsewhere in the company.
Another way of justifying EDP was the added efficiency or reduced investment it made possible. This approach was common in the manufacturing and marketing areas. One of the first

computer applications was inventory control, and firms often reduced their inventory investment with EDP. If EDP could reduce a $10 million inventory by 3%, then $300,000 was available to invest elsewhere.
With the advent of MIS, computer justification became more difficult. An MIS can produce a valuable report, such as the analysis of beer sales by ethnic group used by Sound Distributing Corp. management. But now valuable is the report? Under normal circumstances a report’s monetary value is difficult to assess. A firm could implement the report and then, using the report, compare total profit for the period with the profit during a prior period. For this comparison to be valid, the report would have to be the only change in the firm’s operations—hardly a feasible possibility in a dynamic business setting. There are usually many actions or combinations of actions that could contribute to increased profit, and singling out one is almost impossible.
So the modern manager faces a problem. How does he or she justify something when its worth can’t be exactly measured? Quite simply, the manager has to have faith that the MIS contributes more to revenues than to costs. This is not an unusual approach. Million of dollars are spent on advertising each year, even though the revenue value of advertising is impossible to measure. Of course, some firms spend money on advertising because their competitors do. The same logic could apply to computer use. A firm with a good MIS will do a better job of managing its resources and will probably be more competitive than a firm with a poor MIS.
Because of the difficulty of justifying an MIS, firms approach the decision very seriously. Much manager and staff time is spent evaluating the impact the MIS will have on the organization. Although the process is largely subjective, justifying the MIS is a key step in the achievement of this valuable resource.
翻译软件译得不怎么通,有人能自己翻译么?谢谢

辩解MIS
MIS 资源应该经济上被辩解相似作为其他规模可观的开支。 在EDP 时代期间, 企业通常辩解了计算机和它伴生的费用的费用由费用与那些被偏移的指南比较, keydriven, 或穿孔卡系统。即使计算机费用超出了费用的keydriven 和穿孔卡设备, 很少人必须为计算机系统。 计算机然后被辩解了根据被偏移的职员费用。 少数这些职员工作者实际上失去了他们的工作, 但是, 因为他们在公司中在别处通常转移了。
辩解EDP 其它方式是它使成为可能的增加的效率或减少了投资。 这种方法是共同在制造业和行销领域。 一的当中一个
计算机应用是存货控制, 并且企业经常减少了他们的存货投资以EDP 。 如果EDP 能减少一件$10 百万存货按3%, 然后$300,000 有时间在别处投资。
以MIS 出现, 计算机辩解变得更加困难。 MIS 可能导致一个可贵的报告, 譬如对啤酒销售的分析由族群由Sound Distributing Corp 使用。 管理。 但贵重物品现在是报告? 在正常之下情况报告的金钱价值是难估计。 企业能实施报告和然后, 使用报告,总赢利为期间与赢利比较在一个预先的期间。 为这比较是合法的, 报告会必须是唯一的变化在公司的操作坚硬上每可行的可能性在一个动态企业设置。有通常能对增加的赢利贡献的许多行动的行动或组合, 并且挑选一是几乎不可能的。
如此现代经理面对问题。 他或她怎么辩解某事当它价值不能确切地被测量? 相当简单地, 经理必须有信念, MIS 对收支贡献更多比对费用。 这不是一种异常的方法。 百万的美元花在每年做广告上, 即使做广告的收支价值无法测量。 当然, 一些企业花金钱在做广告上因为他们的竞争者。 同样逻辑能适用于计算机用途。 一个企业以好MIS 比一个企业将做处理它的资源一个更好的工作, 大概竞争的以粗劣的MIS 。
由于辩解MIS 困难, 企业非常严重接近决定。 经理和职员时刻花费评估MIS 将有在组织的冲击。 虽然过程是主要主观的, 辩解MIS 是关键步在这种可贵的资源的成就。