高考问答神奇女侠的盾牌放哪:求英语高手
来源：百度文库 编辑：高考问答 时间：2024/04/28 22:51:28
请帮我翻译以下论文 谢谢
Intoxication 461
would be conclusively presumed incapable of committing a crime．Lem
could probably be tried as a juvenile offender；he could not be tried and
convicted as an adult for a criminal offense．
Some states，however，do not set any minimum age of responsibili-
ty·Instead，they permit the prosecutor to introduce evidence that the
defendant knew what he was doing and that it was wrong．①Here the
prosecutor might be able to prove that Lem had a motive to commit the
crime and that the attack on Matt was premeditated and intentional．
Moreover，Gabriel’S testimony might also establish that Lem knew that
his behavior was wrong．By’threatening Gabriel，Lem was trying to avoid
detection．This indicates that Lem knew that attacking Matt was wrong．
Lem might be tried for attempted murder in the first degree，②subject to
the juvenile court’S jurisdiction in this state．
Whether Ben and Jamal can be tried and convicted for burglary and
theft of the tricycle will be decided by the same analysis．Because Ben
was 7 and Jamal was 9 when they went into Matt’S house and stole the tri，
cycle，it is more likely that the prosecutor would be able to try both as
adults．
If successful in persuading a court that any of these young children
should be tried as adult offenders，the prosecutor would also have to Der，
suade the court tbat the defendants are competent to stand trial．She
would have to show that they understand the charges against them and the
nature of the proceedings and that they could assist their attorneys．
Under the Model Penal Code all of the defendants would have a valid
defense of“immaturity”because they were under 16 years old at the
time of the crii¨c．Thus．none of the defendants could be tried and COn-
victed of any crime．Instead，they would be dealt with in the iuvenile
court system．
Intoxication 461
would be conclusively presumed incapable of committing a crime．Lem
could probably be tried as a juvenile offender；he could not be tried and
convicted as an adult for a criminal offense．
Some states，however，do not set any minimum age of responsibili-
ty·Instead，they permit the prosecutor to introduce evidence that the
defendant knew what he was doing and that it was wrong．①Here the
prosecutor might be able to prove that Lem had a motive to commit the
crime and that the attack on Matt was premeditated and intentional．
Moreover，Gabriel’S testimony might also establish that Lem knew that
his behavior was wrong．By’threatening Gabriel，Lem was trying to avoid
detection．This indicates that Lem knew that attacking Matt was wrong．
Lem might be tried for attempted murder in the first degree，②subject to
the juvenile court’S jurisdiction in this state．
Whether Ben and Jamal can be tried and convicted for burglary and
theft of the tricycle will be decided by the same analysis．Because Ben
was 7 and Jamal was 9 when they went into Matt’S house and stole the tri，
cycle，it is more likely that the prosecutor would be able to try both as
adults．
If successful in persuading a court that any of these young children
should be tried as adult offenders，the prosecutor would also have to Der，
suade the court tbat the defendants are competent to stand trial．She
would have to show that they understand the charges against them and the
nature of the proceedings and that they could assist their attorneys．
Under the Model Penal Code all of the defendants would have a valid
defense of“immaturity”because they were under 16 years old at the
time of the crii¨c．Thus．none of the defendants could be tried and COn-
victed of any crime．Instead，they would be dealt with in the iuvenile
court system．