黑暗圣经 结局:帮我翻译一段话

来源:百度文库 编辑:高考问答 时间:2024/04/28 23:54:23
不管是把“语文”课程界定为“语言、文字”,还是“语言、文学”,谁都不敢贸然把 “语言”这一大项丢掉,而且总是要排在首位。这是否说明我们的语文教学对语言教学十分 重视了呢 ? 仅就作文训练而言,必须把学生是否能在习作中比较经常、恰当 地运用所学过的词语,作为教学成败得失的一个十分重要的衡量标准,而“联词组段”再如, 小学生的作文里只会出现“好看”“美丽”“漂亮”等词汇,而初中作文就应当会用“艳 丽”“华丽”“瑰丽”“标致”等词汇,高中生则还要把“富丽”“典丽”“俏丽”“明丽 ”“绮丽”“亮丽”等纳入自己的作文视野。真正高效的方法之一是结合课文 词语的学习,坚持不懈地进行“联词组段”训练。现代语言学已经开始描述每个词汇单位的主要潜在“关系网”。他们首先提出并且完善了“内部言语”的概念,认为人类的言 语表述一般过程是“思想-内部言语-扩展性外部言语结构”。应该说,“联词组段”的训练方式与内部言语这一中介形式的 主要特征是十分相似的。 当然,一般来说,设计进行联词组段练习的那些词语并非是信手拈来的,而是结 合课文内容或特定语境需要而确定的。

Whether the "language" courses defined as "language, writing," or "language, literature," Not daring to make the "language" of this major loss, but always to be ranked in the first place. Does this mean that our language teaching attaches great importance to language teaching? Only essay training, the students must take in the exercises more frequently and learned the proper use of the phrase, as the success or failure of teaching a very important measure, "the phrase," Another example, pupils essay Lane will be a "good" and "beautiful" and "beautiful" vocabulary, and junior essay should be used "Amy Korea," "magnificent" and "Beauty" "Peugeot" terminology, high school students are also "hold" and "Code of Korea" and "pretty" and "bright" and "Alice" and "brilliant" in his essay vision. One way is truly efficient in terms of learning lessons, unremittingly "of the phrase" training. Modern linguistics has begun vocabulary to describe each of the main unit of potential "networks." They first put forward and perfected the "internal speech" concept that the human language that the general process is the statement of "ideological - house speech-language expansionary external structure." It should be said that "the phrase of" training methods and the internal language of the main features of this form of intermediation is very similar. Of course, in general, for the design phase of the exercise of those words is not easy, but bear with text content or specific needs identified by speaking context.

If the "language" courses defined as "language, writing," or "language, literature," Not daring to make the "language" of this major loss, but not rarely to be ranked in the first place. Does this mean that our language teaching attaches great importance to language teaching? Only essay training, the students must take in the exercises more frequently and learned the proper use of the phrase, as the success or failure of teaching a very important measure, "the phrase," Another example, pupils essay Lane will be a "good" and "beautiful" and "beautiful" vocabulary, and junior essay should be used "Amy Korea," "magnificent" and "Beauty" "Peugeot" terminology, high school students are also "hold" and "Code of Korea" and "pretty" and "bright" and "Alice" and "brilliant" in his essay vision. One way is truly efficient in terms of learning lessons, unremittingly "of the phrase" training. Modern linguistics has begun vocabulary to describe each of the main unit of potential "networks." They first put forward and perfected the "internal speech" concept that the human language that the general process is the statement of "ideological - house speech-language expansionary external structure." It should be said that "the phrase of" training methods and the internal language of the main features of this form of intermediation is very similar. Of course, in general, for the design phase of the exercise of those words is not easy, but bear with text content or specific needs identified by speaking exam.

Whether a linguistic course is defined as involving ” language and words” or “language and literature,” none is so bold as to cast the training away; instead, the course is always put on top of the other subjects for students to learn. Does it demonstrate that we lay much stress on language teaching? When it comes to composition- writing, the standard by which to measure the success of language teaching is expected to assess whether the student can frequently and properly exercise the expressions previously learned. Moreover, the student should combine expressions into sentences and sentences into paragraphs in order to convey the idea.
The levels of proficiency vary with different stages of education. For instance, elementary school pupils can communicate the idea of “beauty” only through such words as “good-looking”, “beautiful” and “pretty”. In the case of junior high school students, they do so by employing words like “fine-looking”, “decorative” “gorgeous” and “handsome”. By contrast, in addition to the foregoing words, senior high school students would not feel satisfied without putting into their vocabulary such words as “luxurious”, “magnificent”, “enchanting”, “splendid”, “sumptuous” and “spectacular”. One of the efficient ways to achieve high-quality compositions is to persist in sentence-making and paragraph-writing drills, making use of those expressions learned from the textbook.
Modern linguistics has started to describe each unit of expression as having its respective connected “network”. The concept of “inner language” has been presented for the fist time and is to be perfected. The theory in question maintains that humans’ verbal communication is the process of turning thoughts, or inner language, into outer language, or audible words. It should be pointed out that the main characteristics of sentence-making and paragraph-writing are quite similar to those of the so-called inner language. Beyond any doubt, as is a common case, the expressions used in the composition-writing drill are not picked up at random; on the contrary, they are picked out to correspond with the content of a lesson or a specific situation.